中文   |  BIG5  |  Español  | Français  |  Deutsch  |  Русский  |   日本語  |  한국어  |  English
    
 
Feature  |  Pictures  |  Videos  |  Data  |  FAQ  |  E-Book  |  Voice of Religion Circle  |  Officia Statement
Home | Full Presentation  |  Recommendation  |  Rumor & Fact  |  Public Opinion  |  Word from Ex-member  |  View from Intelligentsia  |  China | World
 
首页 > Media Reports > World
 
Coronavirus: Man facing deportation to China from Canada cites 'raging epidemic' as reason to stay
 
Toronto resident Ruepang Cao argued that being removed to China would put him at serious risk of irreparable harm
Adjust font size:   Close nationalpost.com Tom Blackwell 2020-02-29
 

   

  
A worker puts on his protective suit before entering a laboratory at a centre for disease control and prevention, as the country is hit by an outbreak of the novel coronavirus, in Taiyuan, Shanxi province, China February 14, 2020.

  The advice is clear. Canada is urging its residents to avoid “non-essential” travel to China because of the still-spreading new coronavirus. The U.S. government has recommended against any kind of visit to the country until the disease is contained.

  But what about a unique group of people with little choice in their travel plans — those deemed inadmissible to Canada and facing deportation to China?

  Their fate gave rise to a novel legal dispute late last week, as Toronto resident Ruepang Cao argued that being removed to China would put him at serious risk of irreparable harm from the “raging epidemic.”

  In fact, Canada has already put a temporary halt to deportations to Wuhan and surrounding Hubei province — the new disease’s epicentre — though not elsewhere in China, a Justice Department submission in the case revealed.

  But a Federal Court judge rejected Cao’s appeal to delay his removal by two or three months, noting he was not being sent to Wuhan and the outlook for “the vast majority of people” infected by the pathogen is positive.

  I sincerely believe this gentleman’s life would be in danger

  Deportations can be blocked if courts deem there is a significant risk that someone will suffer irreparable harm from being sent to a particular destination.

  Cao’s lawyer, Milan Tomasevic, said he was disappointed by the ruling from Justice Robert Barnes, especially when countries like the U.S. are advocating against any sort of travel to China.

  “I think it’s an outrageous decision,” said Tomasevic. “I was shocked that we would be sending somebody [to China] … I sincerely believe this gentleman’s life would be in danger.”

  Cao, 36, who came to Canada in 2004, and made an ultimately unsuccessful refugee claim, was scheduled to be flown to Guangzhou in southern China on Saturday, after Barnes’ decision Thursday.

Journalists wear protective suits inside an elevator as they prepare for a media visit to Indonesian Health Ministry’s Laboratorium for Research on Infectious-Diseases, following the outbreak of the new coronavirus in China, in Jakarta, Indonesia, February 11, 2020. REUTERS/Willy Kurniawan

  His father arrived in this country first and made a refugee claim based on fears of persecution in China because of his Christian faith. The father’s request was accepted and he later sponsored his wife and daughter to join him and became a citizen. But Cao, eager to join his family, was too old to be sponsored.

  He had also asked for asylum based on having converted to Christianity but, after initially claiming to be a Falun Gong practitioner at the urging of an immigration consultant, his claim was rejected, as were further legal appeals. He still has a pending request for permanent resident status based on humanitarian and compassionate grounds.

  In an affidavit, Cao said he had alerted Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) to the coronavirus when it first emerged and his fear the Chinese government was downplaying its seriousness. Then news about the infection – now called Covid-19 – became more dire.

  “I am scared and concerned for my life and cannot understand why CBSA insist on sending me to China at this time and straight into an epidemic of a deadly virus which still rages,” he said.

  In his submission, Justice Department lawyer David Knapp said Canada has not banned travel to China — except Wuhan itself and Hubei province — and that statistics indicate the risk is low in Guangdong province where Cao was headed. Recent media reports suggested only one of every 100,000 citizens there had been infected by Covid-19, he said.

Medical personnels wearing protective suits walk in the ground of a residential estate, in Hong Kong, early on February 11, 2020, after two people in the block were confirmed to have contracted the coronavirus according to local newspaper reports. ANTHONY WALLACE/AFP via Getty Images

  Barnes said no serious issue had been raised regarding the virus risk or possible irreparable harm.

  “The evidence, such as it is, shows that infection and mortality rates in many parts of China are low,” said the judge. “For the vast majority of people who have come down with the virus the outlook is positive. The risk … does not appear to be much, if any, greater than the risk of coming down with some other viral illness, many of which also carry a mortality risk.”

  But Tomasevic said the court should have considered the more stringent guidelines issued by American authorities on travel to China, arguing that the U.S. would have a better handle on what is happening there than Canada.

  A spokesman for the CBSA said a temporary halt on deportations to Hubei province — called an administrative deferral — is in effect, putting it on a list with Somalia, the Gaza Strip, Mali, the Central African Republic, South Sudan, Libya, Yemen, Burundi, Venezuela and Haiti.

    (nationalpost.com,Feb 19,2020)

    

Cnsphoto via REUTERS
Adjust font size:  Close
 
0
  Comment
  Related News
  • Persuaded to Join a Cult2016-07-11
  • ‘The Prophet’ of cult-like church near Owen Sound, gets 18 months for assaulting members2016-09-27
  • Student club connected to an organization accused of cult-like activities2016-06-15
  • Canada Rejected Scientology Narconon Once Again2015-07-07
  • JEHOVAH’S WITNESS: THE COURT AUTHORISES BLOOD TRANSFUSION TO A BABY DESPITE THE REFUSAL OF PARENTS2017-08-14
  • Miss Chinese Toronto Pageant in Canada2016-11-21
  • China enters wheelchair curling final at Winter Paralympics2018-03-17
  • $66M class action sex abuse suit filed against Jehovah's Witnesses2017-12-11
  • Patients Infected with the COVID-19 would Recover without Treatment?2020-02-29
  • Lawsuit: Dragon Springs inching ahead with site plan2020-01-21
  •  
    Email: facts@kaiwind.com Site Map About Us
       Copyright © Cult Studies