Home  /  Editor's Pick

The Cult Problem in Present-Day Japan

2014-05-23 Source:Kaiwind Author:By Yoshihide SAKURAI
Falun G ong,foundered by Li Hongzhi in 19 9 2,rapidly expanded its missionary in China and  evoked cult controversy over believers?devotion to Li Hongzhi in China. Conversely, human  rights watch groups and refugees of Falun G ong in western countries criticized Chinese govern-ment and strongly demanded immediate cessation of its repression. Although Chinese govern-ment as well as Chinese Academy has not changed official position to Falun G ong, they seem  to  have acknowledged  that a cult issue is problematic. Chinese history has too  many cases to  enumerate spiritual cults and religious millennialism  that were heretic and subversive  from  the perspective of successive imperial dynasties. Even if Falun G ong is considered to  have the same character, it cannot be sufficient reason of political restriction in a country where  freedom  of religion constitutionally guaranteed. They consider the necessity of legitimacy not  only of Chinese legislation but also of universal criteria, so that they called experts of cult issue  from  the western countries (England,G ermany,Canada,USA) as well as Asian (India,Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan). I was only participant from  Japan and reported  Japanese cult controversy in present day Japan.

This paper first introduces recent cult controversy and review  cultic studies in Japan. Then  I will illustrate major controversial cults (Aum  Supreme Truth Cult-Aleph in present,Unification  Church, and JM S from  South Korea) and minor cultic groups (Hallelujah Community Church,  M akomo Shrine, and Home of Heart). The latter is small independent Religious Corporation or  self-awareness therapy group. Last I will explain about the social background where such cults  and spiritual movement emerged in Japan and point out the fragility that some Japanese as well  as victimized cult members hold, which should be overcome in near future.
Key words: cult, Falun G ong, Aum, Unification Church, fragility  (Received on D ecember 17, 2007)

29

Journal of the G raduate School of Letters, Hokkaido University

Vol. 3; pp. 29 -38, M arch 2008
?C 2008 by the G raduate School of Letters, Hokkaido University

Yoshihide SAKURAI: saku@let.hokudai.ac.jp

1. Comparative and Sociological Perspective on Cultic Study

On M arch 20,19 9 5 disciples of the Aum  Supreme Truth Cult (hereinafter Aum) released sarin  nerve gas in  five Tokyo  subway  trains, killing  12  and  seriously  injuring  over 5,500  people.

Through this terrifying incident, Japan had to directly face “cults”as a social problem. The media, baffled by the fact that this unprecedented crime was perpetrated by young people with  religious backgrounds, sought explanations from  psychiatrists and  psychologists. In  a Marh  24th article, M argaret Singer, renowned a U. S. cult researcher commented on Aum, calling it a
doomsday cult. Since then, Aum  has been understood by Japanese society as a “cult”(Sakurai, 2000: 74).

Psychologists and  anti-cult people in  Japan  began  to  adopt views on “cults”and “mind  control”from  American anti-cult activists, explaining the traits of cult groups and the mental state  of Aum  followers (Nishida, 19 9 5; Takimoto  and  Nagaoka  eds., 19 9 5; Pascal, 19 9 5). The Japanese media thus started to cover “religious trouble”caused by particular religious groups as  the “cult”problem. In regard to those media reports, Japanese researchers of religion, while also  learning about cults based on the findings of U. S. religious sociology, have expressed different  opinions; we stated that the criteria of a cult was vague and the theory of “mind control”alone  could not sufficiently explain how  and why certain people decided to join the cult and followed  Aum?s religious teachings (Sakurai, 19 9 6;Shimazono, 19 9 8;W atanabe, 19 9 8). This is how  cult  disputes in W estern countries were imported to Japan.

Soon, studies undertaken from  social and cultural perspectives followed. Some pointed out  recent transformations of religious organizations of a  closed  nature in  information-oriented  consuming  society (Shimazono, 19 9 6, 19 9 7) and  explained  the “hyper”edited  version  or  “syncretism”of different religious cultures of new  religion  in  the age of globalization (Inoue,
19 9 9 ). Others interpreted the anti-cult movement as a nationalistic response to different cultures  (Nakano, 2002). Yet, though  their critiques might have succeeded  in  sketching  modern-day  religion, none could present cogent arguments about how  to specifically confront the violence of  religion  and  deal with  religion-induced  damage; they  were  not as convincing  as anti-cult  movements.

Sakurai realized  that Japanese researchers could  not handle religion-related  problems in Japanese society even  with  imported  W estern  theories of “cults”and “mind  control”and/or sociology  of religion (Sakurai, 2002). Thus, in  19 9 7, Sakurai began  conducting  a  series of  surveys on Aum, the Unification Church, Jehovah?s W itness, self-awareness training, and other  cultic groups. The purpose was to examine the existing situations of why certain religious groups  were  deemed  problematic “cults”and  why  their missionary  and  recruiting  technique  were  considered “mind  control.”The survey  methods included  examining  court proceedings and  defense counsel resources, interviewing former members or defectors, their family members, and  acquaintances, and obtaining the expert opinions of religious personnel and counselors who had  supported  them. As a result, Sakurai concluded  that cult issue should  be considered  social  problems (Sakurai, 2003).
In  November, 2003  a  Japanese panel was convened  on “The G rowth  Strategy  of New

Religions in Japan”as a special session at the American Academy of Religion (AAR) annual

Yoshihide SAKURAI   30  meeting. W e discussed the social background behind the emergence of cult problems in postwar  Japan. Yet there was a difference in awareness of the problems between the author and western  researchers of new-religion (Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, 2001). Afterwards, as I further discussed  the anti-cult movement with them, I recognized the following as fundamentally different points  in perceiving the problems:
(1) U. S. religious sociologists, while perceiving the conservative swing of Japanese society in

response to  the the Anti-Aum  Law  and  the anti-Aum  movement by local residents, lack  the

awareness of the relations between the U. S. invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq following 9 -11 and

America?s nationalism  and religious culture. Rather, they believe that the religious pluralism  of

fundamental “freedom  of religion”and “religious tolerance”can neutralize nationalism  and ease

religious and ethnic conflicts. This belief may be valid as an academic theory, but has definite

gaps in reality. This experience once again confirmed the double standard between the language

the U. S. uses for its domestic politics and diplomatic practice.
(2) W estern researchers have difficulty comprehending the manipulative spiritual sales by the

Unification Church in Japan. They often feel incredulous upon hearing that such sales totaled

over 9 5 billion yen (approximately 8 million dollars) between 19 87 and 2006. Even if they accept

the story, they cannot comprehend the mentality behind it ---why so many people willingly paid

so much money to Unification Church recruiters,even if the latter had employed intimidation. It

is certainly true that this type of spiritual sales strategy may work only in Japan. On the other

hand, it is also true that many people in W estern societies have suffered monetary and psychologi-cal damage due to the quasi-psychotherapy program  of Scientology. Thus, the type of fraud a

citizen is vulnerable to depends on the religious culture of that person.
(3) A  dispute has long continued to rage over the psychological manipulation by cults, as a

method  of mind  control, and  regarding the issue of intervention  in  the religious life by exit-counseling. W as it a  voluntary  conversion  or a  coerced  conversion  through  psychological

manipulation? W as it a voluntary defection or a coerced abandonment of religion? Aside from

the peculiarities of each cult group, the difference is how  the independence of individuals and

family ties are perceived in each of the different cultures.
Sakurai realized that while fellow  researchers are discussing the same subject of cult prob-lems, there was a gap in understanding on the subject. For international discussions, I found it

necessary  to  conduct comparative sociological examinations of public  order, which  include

cultures and social norms. Only by comparing the social structure and its components ---social

system, cultural traditions, citizens?“common  sense,”all of which  could  construct the “cult”
problem, can we clarify the differences in  public awareness and  the social method  of shaping

public  spheres. Although  it is called  the “cult”problem, the  nature  of conflicts and  the

anti-cult/sect measure differ greatly between Europe (and inside the EU  as well) and the United

States, and between Japan and other Asian nations. For this reason, the “cult”problem  should

be considered through international comparisons. In this respect, the opportunity offered by the

international symposium  on  the cult problem --- to  exchange opinions among  international

researchers ---is invaluable.
In the following, I will introduce several cases of the cult problem  in Japan today, in the

hopes that they will be used as data for future cult problem  research.
The Cult Problem  in Present-D ay Japan   31

2. The Cult Problem  in Japan

2.1 Various Problems Involving On-Campus Recruiting

Years have passed  since the recruiting by the Unification  Church, Setsuri, Jodo  Shinshu

Shinrankai, or camouflaged groups, as well as psychological therapy groups in which recruiting

is incorporated  into  their program, became social problems in  Japan. There are also  other

groups that conduct pseudo-psychological counseling during college festivals without revealing

their names and  then  use the obtained  personal data for future recruitment activities. These

organizations typically have a technical manual of social psychology on how  to persuade people.
Some not only conceal important information  from  students but also  deftly manipulate their

uneasy or distressed  state of mind. This time, though, I wish  to  discuss some indoctrination

methods of certain cult groups, which can be attractive to students (Sakurai, 2007c).
First, such groups approach students in a receptive manner so that they can help realize the

wish of the younger generation for acceptance by others. Recruiters are not only mild-mannered,
but also build personal relationships necessary for indoctrination by giving the impression that

they will watch over each person and nurture them  in peer groups. Colleges nowadays focus

almost exclusively on the content of the academic subjects they teach and are concerned about

personal relationships inappropriately  or inefficiently  interfering  with  the  college  curricula.
Thus, cult groups succeed in converting students by focusing on the power of personal relation-ships ---relationships that are commonly seen and nurtured in preschool and elementary educa-tion.
Second, those groups offer a detailed programme to somewhat naive students who are not

accustomed to decision making or to the new  non-interfering environment of college life. They

provide students with a golden opportunity. As a result of dismantling the general education

which college used to provide between secondary and higher education, students today no longer

have the time or environment to nurture their own views on life and the world. This is exactly

where cult groups come in. To students who are not sufficiently motivated (or cannot determine

their own  course) toward  learning  specialized  education, knowledge, and  techniques, those

recruiters can strike them  as helpful seniors or leaders.
I recognize the fact that various club activities and other circles can have a positive impact

on young students, and that an abundance of such activities is actually good for college education.
But the problem  is that some groups obviously cross the boundary of decency. The following are

some examples:
(1) Freedom  of religion  can  be violated  through  the recruiting  activity  of camouflaged

groups. Recruiting students are used  to  lies since they think  the end  justifies the means and

themselves use any means. Furthermore, they do not even see the possibility that they have been

deceived.
(2) The self-governance of college education can be threatened by student groups that are

controlled by outsiders. In the face of explicit criticism  against certain religious groups, such

groups may counter by hiring legal counsel and demanding tolerance and non-intervention from

college authorities.
(3) The pursuit of education, the primary objective of college, can be replaced by the pursuit

32   Yoshihide SAKURAI

of religious group activities. In that case, educational guidance will be necessary and this is the

only point of defense the college can use to intervene in the personal affairs of students. Not

surprisingly, many religious groups scheme to distract colleges from  claiming this point.
How  should faculty members view  the fact that a great number of students attempt to reinvent

themselves based on the values of certain religious groups in the critical period of college life

when, in  my opinion, a broader perspective and  worldview  should  be nurtured? This point

warrants further discussion (Sakurai, 2007b).
2.2 The Unification Church: An Organization That Conducts Illegal Fundraising

In  2003, a former Unification  Church  member in  her late sixties filed  a 670-million-yen
(approximately 5.7 million dollars) damage claim  against the church. She demanded that the

church return the money she had donated since the early 19 9 0s while she belonged to the church.
Let us look at the background.
Since the 19 80s, the Unification Church has conducted recruiting activities in the form  of

fortunetelling  by  name or family  tree, targeting  middle-aged  and  older people. The church

invited wealthy people, in particular, to a variety of posh events and treated them  exceptionally

well. The strategy was to  gradually coax those people of means into  donating money to  the

church. The plaintiff was recruited in one of those events.
If a citizen noticed something suspicious or abnormal about a certain religious group before

joining the organization, and then filed a damage suit against it, then that person could obtain

legal redress for his or her losses owing to manipulative spiritual sales. But in this case, the act

of donating money by the plaintiff after joining the church was deemed religious activity engaged

in of her own free will, thus the claim  was rejected. In a nutshell, church would never pay back

donations to soon-to-be former members. The court understood that she was a member because

of the spiritual effect (religious relief) in  accordance with  her donation; a certain  equivalent

exchange was deemed to be established. However, lawyers began to think that once a case of

illegal missionary activity was established, the act of donating money to the church could be also

considered damage to the plaintiff under illegal circumstances. If the court acknowledged that

former members joined the church and were forced to conduct illegal manipulative sales not by

their free will, then their act of donating money should also be deemed unlawful solicitation of

donations, and not by free will.
The Unification Church, on the other hand, responded that the plaintiff had continued to

make donations of her own free will and pointed out a series of her church activities as supporting

evidence. In 2006, the Tokyo D istrict Court ruled that less than half of the 50 acts of making

donations were illegal. In the 2007 appeal trial, the verdict in the first trial was upheld. The

reasoning behind the decision was as follows:
It is illegal to solicit donations through intimidation, claiming, for example, that the souls of

a member?s ancestors will not be saved. However, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant has

done so  using  explicit language. But the plaintiff sometimes made a  donation  after simply

receiving a request by telephone, not after a spiritual talk or ritual. In those cases, it is deemed

that the plaintiff donated money of her own free will. Therefore, the unlawful solicitation of

donations through intimidation was acknowledged only on two occasions:when the plaintiff was

33   The Cult Problem  in Present-D ay Japan

first recruited and immediately before she fled the church. However, this verdict is problematic

in the following ways:
(1) According to the verdict, when the plaintiff wished to resist the illegal recruiting and

soliciting by the church, the presence of illegality  was acknowledged. But when  she was a

member obediently responding to requests for donations, her donations were all deemed volun-tary. In other words, as the plaintiff?s mistrust grew  towards the church, her donations came to

be deemed  illegal. Although  the Unification  Church?s method  of urging members to  donate

money was always consistent, depending on how  the plaintiff felt about the method, it could be

legal or illegal. And once that decision was made by the court, even if the plaintiff is presently

seeking damages against the church, we are told that that decision will stand no matter what.
(2) Aside from  the appropriateness of the circumstances of the donation  request, was the

amount of donation within a socially acceptable range? It is true that the plaintiff was treated

well by the Unification Church. Specifically, she received seven copies of the holy book “D ivine

Principle,”which had been autographed by the founder Sun M yung M oon and allegedly valued

at 30 million  yen (approximately 256 thousand  dollars). She also  enjoyed  VIP  status in  the

church under the title of“Benefactor.”Yet, did that life justify paying 670-million-yen (approxi-mately 5.7 million dollars) ?
According to current law, activities such as the missionary work and fundraising events of the

Unification Church are not comprehensively deemed as illegal group activities, thus the court

must determine illegality based on individual circumstances. The ruling also stated, “Because we

cannot consider all the donations made over the 12-year period to have been extorted through

intimidation, we have no choice but judge each case separately.”Yet this is painfully obvious.
If the situation is such that mental and physical threats must be made in each case in order for

members to obey, that is akin to the oppression of slaves or colonial rule. Clearly, this is an

inefficient system; thus, indoctrination is adopted as an appropriate measure. W hether it is a

religious or ideological organization, because its members are under the paradoxical rule of

voluntary obedience to the leader or values, the organization can form  a strong movement.
2.3 Aum  Today

As of 2007, Aum (Aleph) has 650 live-in followers and over 1,000 lay followers in Japan, and

approximately 300 members in Russia. It has 29 facilities in 15 prefectures in Japan and several

facilities in M oscow, Russia. How should we treat those people in Japanese society in the future?
In 2006, judging that Aum  may still attempt to carry out another indiscriminate attack in the

future, the Public Security Examination Commission extended the surveillance on Aleph. The

decision was based on the fact that the group had retained the dogmatic system  and organizational

structure that remained devoted to Shoko Asahara (born Chizuo M atsumoto) who was sentenced

to  death  in  September, 2006. There were also  a  great number of followers who  appeared

unrepentant over their criminal acts including the sarin gas attack in the Tokyo subway. The

objection of the local community, who must coexist with Aleph, also remains very strong. There

are approximately 230 groups in 180 municipalities in Japan that oppose the expansion of Aleph.
They have filed 225 requests and petitions to the M inister of Justice and the D irector of the Public

Security  Intelligence Agency  to  renew  the surveillance period  and  to  strengthen  regulations

34   Yoshihide SAKURAI

against Aleph. As a result, security police and local police have continued their surveillance of

Aleph. Spot inspections have been conducted 146 times, as well as 31 interviews to confirm  the

identity of members. So far, the survey results have been presented 388 times to 43 municipalities
(Public Security Intelligence Agency, 2007).
Aleph still continues to recruit members (by hosting various seminars) and hold fundraising

events. One involved a Chinese imported medicine with steroids called “Togen.”Some Aleph

members received jail sentences after Tokyo Branch members sold it in violation of the Pharma-ceutical Affairs Law. W e will probably never see Aleph approved as a religious corporation,but

the national government has no authority to stop their activity as a religious group. Likewise,
municipalities have no authority to reject the residency of its members. Once they legally obtain

or rent a domicile, it is their right to reside there. In that case, there is no legal basis supporting

the anti-Aleph movement of local residents. Neither the Executive nor the Judicial branch can

make any move; only the Public Security Intelligence Agency has continued its surveillance on

Aleph.
The basic faction that continues to worship Asahara is still powerful. M eanwhile,Fumihiro

Joyu, the former Aum  spokesperson and de facto chief, in an attempt to distance himself from

Asahara, launched a new  group called “Hikari no W a (Ring of Light)”in M ay, 2007, leaving

Aleph along with 200 followers (Yomiuri Shimbun, M ay 7, 2007). Yet, many Aleph followers

believe that Joyu  still submits to  Asahara  and  they  therefore stand  by  Joyu  as well. It is

unknown whether there are hidden power struggles inside Aleph.
2.4 Cult Problems in the New  Century

From  around the mid-19 9 0s,the Japanese economy endured a long period of stagnation,from

which it is now  finally emerging. Currently, one serious problem  is the growing gap between

classes, which has become a major social issue. Until the 19 80s, the main factor was economic

inequality caused by disparities in assets such as real estate and stocks. Since then, the manufac-turing industry, which used to be at the heart of the Japanese economy, has moved overseas or

greatly reduced wage and salary costs by employing a large number of non-full-time workers. As

a result, stable workplaces for skilled or semi-skilled workers have disappeared. Only certain

groups of workers with  high  productivity  receive high  salaries; M cD onald?s-like replaceable

low-wage service-sector workers have grown in number. In the latter case, they can barely make

ends meet, and  cannot even  think  about getting married  and/or starting a family. For such

non-full-time workers, losing a job often means losing a place to live. According to the M inistry

of Health, Labor and W elfare, currently, 5,400 workers sleep at 24-hour Internet cafes and the

homeless population numbers 18,564 (a drop from  the 30,000 figure of 2003). Even middle-class

full-time workers are stressed out due to the concentrated and long hours of work required for

high productivity. Labor in Japan has become unstable, and there are an increasing number of

people who have trouble earning a steady living or having a positive outlook for the future.
History shows that whenever a large number of people of a class or a group  experience

downward mobility as well as economic downturns, religious movements emerge. Yet, in Japan,
no new  religious movement aspiring to reform  society has emerged. The labor movement has

also been on the decline, and the social movement to reform  society has lost its momentum. The

35   The Cult Problem  in Present-D ay Japan

new  religious movement that saved the poor and the sick in postwar Japan seems to have failed

to attract the young and middle-age population; the age of followers of new  religions continues

to rise. Instead, the “therapy”culture, in which people can purchase personal and psychological

relief for themselves with a touch of neoliberalism, has thrived. It ranges from  psychotherapy,
such as counseling and coaching, to spiritual services like “healing.”One popular example is the

New-Age worldview  captured in the slogan “change yourself, then the world will change.”
Apart from  on-campus recruiting by various cultic groups and manipulative spiritual sales

methods of the Unification  Church, and  the remaining members of Aleph, common  religious

cult-related problems in our times are relatively minor. These include inappropriate relations

between therapist and client, the misappropriation of client money by spiritual mediums, and the

abuse of members by a priest at a small, exclusive church. Here, allow  me to introduce some

typical examples.
The chief priest of the Hallelujah Community Church (independent religious corporation) in

Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Prefecture is currently being sued over alleged assaults on his followers
(suspected of severe physical punishment, humiliation, and sexual harassment) (2006 ワwa) Vol.
7, Shizuoka D istrict Court). The case is pending in  court. Since some evangelical churches

demand that their followers be obedient to the absolute authority of priests, the autocratic nature

of their leaders is conspicuous. In the case of independent churches, there is no denomination

to take a leadership role and supervise, and a cultic nature seems to develop relatively easily.
The guru of the M akomo Shrine (independent religious corporation) in G ifu Prefecture sold

M akomo  health  food (made from  cattail leaves and  stems) as a remedy to  cure all kinds of

illnesses. Some patients diagnosed with a refractory disease rejected conventional medicine and

took  M akomo. As a result, some people became seriously ill or died. On  July 18, 2005 a

12-year-old girl who had been under dietary treatment at the“Next G eneration Farm  Lab,”a food

laboratory run by the guru, died. She had been diagnosed with Type-I diabetes. The guru was

brought up on criminal charges but the case was dismissed. The girl?s parents filed a damage

claim  and the case is currently pending in court.
In 2004, participants of “Home of Heart,”a self-awareness training seminar, filed a several-million-yen (approximately 60 thousand dollars) damage suit against its organizers at the Tokyo

D istrict Court, claiming that they had  been  forced  to  take a 300,000-yen (approximately  2.6

thousand  dollars) seminar repeatedly. In  2007 the plaintiff won  the case. The former lead

vocalist of the X-Japan  rock  group, Toshi, had  participated  in  the seminar. His female fans
(including several divorced women with children) were forced to lead a communal life. Home

of Heart was charged on suspicion of not providing an adequate nursing environment;two infants

and four small children were taken into custody by the authorities.
In response to the accusations of the former participants, the lawyers on the Home of Heart

side countered with a defamation suit, requesting disciplinary action. M ultiple lawsuits have

been  launched. This is a  typical case of a  cultic training  seminar in  which  the issues are

psychotherapy that leaves participants traumatized and bankruptcy of seminar participants due to

the exorbitant seminar fees.
36   Yoshihide SAKURAI

3. Conclusions

In a complex modern world, it is extremely important to be able to deal with various risks.
Unfortunately, the ability to avoid risks is unequally distributed in society. The instability and

intraclass gaps in modern society divide our culture hierarchically. Our primary culture seems to

be disappearing and is fragmenting into sub-cultures according to  class. Because the cultural

ability of risk hedging has been declining, people tend to be more vulnerable to troubles. At the

same time, since sophisticated religious cultures and religious groups teaching human  wisdom

have lost much of their power, religious groups that are insensitive to the ill effects of religion are

being generated. Thus, it is only natural that many Japanese citizens who claim  to practice no

religion and have only a fragile view  of life and death, tend to exclude religion from  their lives,
and therefore, lack knowledge of religious cultures and different religions, making them  vulner-able to cult groups and false spirituality (Sakurai, 2006; 2007a).
Those who have been victimized by cultic groups share several common threads of vulnerabil-ity:
(1) Socioeconomic Fragility: they entrust themselves to a religious group, where there are

people who will take care of them.
(2) Fragility in Identity: once they start a journey of self-discovery, they seem  to have no

control over when or where to stop.
(3) Fragile Relationships:they thoroughly indulge in the communal nature of exclusive cultic

groups.
(4) Fragility in Intelligence: they easily embrace pseudoscience and lack common sense.
Now, the question is “Are those fragile qualities part of their personality, and do they deserve

what they?ve gotten themselves into?”Those qualities, including personal knowledge and the

ability to make judgments, can be dictated by social environment to a certain degree. If there are

family members who they can depend on psychologically and economically, and who they can

consult with in times of crisis, trouble can be avoided to a great extent.
In the future, it will be necessary to further clarify those weaknesses to cultic groups and come

up  with  methods to  overcome them. Yet, both  the Executive and  Judicial branches operate

slowly, because they attempt to tackle the cult problem  with the noble and abstract mind-set of
“freedom  of religion.”For this reason, they lean on the ideal that all religions were selected by

their followers of their own free will. And,as a rule,a religious problem  is considered a personal

problem  that exists inside the mind of the individual. Thus, Executive and Judicial intervention

has been avoided.
The reality, however, is that a number of religious groups practice illegal recruiting, fundrais-ing, and physical abuse on their followers. One cannot say the existing situation is such that

followers join  the organizations by their own  free will and  conduct missionary work  at their

discretion. Therefore, it is important to persistently inform  the Executive and Judicial branches

of government, the media and the general public about the current circumstances. It is a long,
yet steady and certain way to overcome the cult problem  in Japan.
37   The Cult Problem  in Present-D ay Japan

References

Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, 2001, Benjamin Zablocki and Thomas Robbins eds., M isunderstanding Cults, University

of Toronto Press, Toronto

Inoue, Nobutake, 19 9 9 , Lost Coordinates; The Youth and Present-D ay Religion, Chikuma-Shobo.
Public Security Agency, 2007, interview: its contents will be published in a Police W hite Paper, 2008

Sakurai, Yoshihide, 19 9 6, One Examination of the D escription of the Aum  Phenomenon;a Critical Examination

on M ind Control Language, M odern Sociological Study, Vol. 9 .
Sakurai, Yoshihide, 2002, Forms of the Cult Problem  in Japan;the Issue of Religious Sociological Cult Research,
Nanzan Religious Culture Laboratory, ed., Between Religion and Social Issues;the Cult Problem, Seikyu-sha,
pp. 100-118.
Sakurai, Yoshihide, 2003, Trials and the M ind Control D ispute;Over the ?Forceful Persuasion?and ?Responsibility

for Illegal Acts,?Hokkaido University G raduate School of Letters, 109 , pp. 59 -175.
Sakurai, Yoshihide, 2005, Various Problems of Survey Research on the Cult Problem;Regarding the Framing and

Narrative, “Annual Report: Social Science Basics Research,”Vol. 4, pp. 57-75.
Sakurai, Yoshihide, 2006, Reexamining the ?Cult?, Chuokoron-shinsha.
Sakurai, Yoshihide, 2007a, The Relationship Between the Cult Problem  and Intraclass G aps,W atanabe,Naoki,ed.,
A  G uide to Understanding Religion and the M odern Age, Heibonsha, pp. 140-143.
Sakurai, Yoshihide, 2007b, Religious Literacy  Education  as an  Anti-Cult M easure, International Religious

Laboratory, M odern Religion 2007; the Horizon of Religious Education, Akiyama Shoten, pp. 300-321.
Sakurai, Yoshihide, 2007c, The Cult Problem  on Campus; W hy Students Join Setsuri, High School Education

Journal ---High School Education and Continuing Education, Vol. 15, pp. 1-13.
Shimazono, Susumu, 19 9 6, The Commercialization of the Sacred;Changes in Religious Services and G ift G iving,
Shimazono, Susumu, and Ishi, Kenji, eds., Consumption of Religion, Shunju-sha, pp. 88-110.
Shimazono, Susumu, 19 9 7, Possibilities of M odern-D ay Religion;Aum  Shinrikyo and Violence, Iwanami Shoten.
Shimazono, Susumu, 19 9 8, Beyond M ind Control; Legal Accusations of Religious G roups and Socioecological

Criticism, Psychiatrics, 40-10, 11.
Takimoto, Taro  and  Nagaoka, Tatsuya, eds., Free from  M ind  Control; the Experiences of Aum  Shinrikyo

D efectors, Koyu Shuppan.
Nakano, Takeshi, 2002, The Restoration of Religion; G lobalization, the Cult D ispute, Nationalism, Tokyo-D o

Shuppan.
Nishida, Kimiaki, 19 9 5, W hat is M ind Control? Kinokuniya Books.
Pascal, Zivi 19 9 5, Exit M ind Control; the Hearts of Unification Church Followers, Koyu Shuppan.
Yamaguchi, Hiroshi, et al., 2000, Countermeasures for Cult Religions, Kyoiku Shiryo Shuppankai.
W atanabe, M anabu, 19 9 8, One Perspective on the Cult Theory; the M ind Control D ispute in the United States,
Chugai Nippo, D ec. 15th and 17th, 19 9 8.
38   Yoshihide SAKURAI
 
分享到: